The Free Speech Exception to Palestine

Now that (even moderate) pro-Palestine sentiment has been effectively outlawed in both the public and private sectors, I hope we can say goodbye to the Western myth of “free speech” from which so many reactionaries built their careers.

The following is a reproduction, with slight modifications, of an article recently published in a special issue of Middle East Critique, “The Academic Question of Palestine,” edited by Walaa Alqaisiya and Nicola Perugini.

The title of this essay inverts a common phrase, “the Palestine exception to free speech,” first used by civil rights attorney Michael Ratner (2013) and later popularized by Maria LaHood of the Center for Constitutional Rights.  While it is true that free speech protections often fail to accommodate criticism of Israel in various Western countries, the phrase assumes that the failure is out of character.  An alternate view would suggest that exclusion of Palestine results from the limitations of free speech itself.  As is often the case, the issue of Palestine exposes hypocrisy, myth, or deceit in the USA’s exceptional self-image. 

Continue reading “The Free Speech Exception to Palestine”

College Administrators Care About Your Speech Rights–If You’re a Nazi

They disapprove of speech favorable to Palestinians, however.

Discussing free speech in the United States is a losing proposition.  Every political demographic screams about hypocrisy, but doing so misses the larger point:  it’s impossible to lionize speech as understood in this country without also being hypocritical.  That’s because civil liberties are indivisible from the needs of power.  In many cases, speech isn’t performed as a freedom; it’s an asset exploited by the shrewdest consumers.  

Continue reading “College Administrators Care About Your Speech Rights–If You’re a Nazi”